Finance & Banking
The examiner will ask who had access. Have an answer that is already true.
Financial consolidation, regulatory reporting, and IT controls for institutions whose systems are examined on a schedule rather than reviewed on request.
Draft for review — Draft sector positioning. Confirm the compliance frameworks named on this page are ones OneVision genuinely works to before this goes live.
You are probably here because
- Examination preparation consumes weeks of finance and IT time each cycle
- Elevated ERP access has accumulated and nobody owns the review
- Regulatory and management reporting are produced from different data
- Consolidation across subsidiaries relies on a spreadsheet only one person can run
- Change control exists in policy but not in the actual system trail
What makes this sector different
Financial institutions run their core banking systems under real discipline and then discover that the ERP, the consolidation model, and the reporting layer around them were never held to the same standard. That gap is what examinations find.
We implement finance and reporting systems so the control story is true before anyone asks: designed access, documented change control, and reporting that traces to source without a manual step in the middle.
What we actually do here
Consolidation & reporting
Multi-entity consolidation in EPM with regulatory and management views produced from the same close rather than reconciled afterward.
Access governance
Role design, elevated-access reduction, and recertification that runs as a process rather than as pre-examination cleanup.
IT controls & change management
Change control that leaves a trail an examiner can follow, implemented in the tooling teams already use.
Reporting traceability
Every reported figure traceable to its source system, so a question about a number does not become a project.
Scheduled
Examinations arrive on a calendar, not on request
Every user
Scope of an access review, not a sample
Traceable
Standard every reported number has to meet
What you are measured against
We would rather name the frameworks up front than discover in week six that the configuration cannot satisfy one of them.
FFIEC guidance
IT and operational controls aligned to the handbooks your examiners work from.
FDIC & call reporting
Reporting requirements built into the close calendar and the data model rather than handled at the end.
SOX & internal control
Control design and evidence that holds up between audits, not only during them.
Draft for review — Every framework above needs confirming against what OneVision can genuinely speak to in a first call. Naming one you cannot is worse than omitting it.
Platforms we run in finance & banking
Services we deliver most here
Questions from this sector
Can you work alongside our internal audit and compliance functions?
That is the only way this works. We are not a substitute for internal audit; we make the systems they examine defensible, and we would rather find the finding before they do.
How quickly can elevated access be reduced without breaking operations?
Faster than most institutions expect, because the majority of elevated access is unused. Start with what nobody has touched in ninety days — that is a large reduction with effectively no operational risk.
Do you provide vCISO coverage?
Yes, as part of our cybersecurity practice, and it is a common fit for institutions that need senior security judgment without a full-time hire.
Other industries
Engineering & Construction
The job is the unit of account. Most ERP configurations forget that.
Industrial Manufacturing & Fabrication
If the shop floor and the ledger disagree, the ledger is wrong.
Oil & Gas
You answer to partners and regulators at the same time, from the same ledger.
Healthcare
Every system that touches PHI has to survive an audit. Including the ERP.
State & Federal Government
Public money needs a trail, not a reconciliation.